SwiftCallingConv.h File Reference

#include "clang/AST/CanonicalType.h"
#include "clang/AST/CharUnits.h"
#include "clang/AST/Type.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TrailingObjects.h"
#include <cassert>

Go to the source code of this file.

Classes
class	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::SwiftAggLowering

Namespaces
namespace	llvm
	Diagnostic wrappers for TextAPI types for error reporting.
namespace	clang
	The JSON file list parser is used to communicate input to InstallAPI.
namespace	clang::CodeGen
namespace	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall

Functions
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::shouldPassIndirectly (CodeGenModule &CGM, ArrayRef< llvm::Type * > types, bool asReturnValue)
	Should an aggregate which expands to the given type sequence be passed/returned indirectly under swiftcall?
CharUnits	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::getMaximumVoluntaryIntegerSize (CodeGenModule &CGM)
	Return the maximum voluntary integer size for the current target.
CharUnits	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::getNaturalAlignment (CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::Type *type)
	Return the Swift CC's notion of the natural alignment of a type.
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::isLegalIntegerType (CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::IntegerType *type)
	Is the given integer type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the current platform?
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::isLegalVectorType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy)
	Is the given vector type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the current platform?
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::isLegalVectorType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::Type *eltTy, unsigned numElts)
std::pair< llvm::Type *, unsigned >	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::splitLegalVectorType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy)
	Minimally split a legal vector type.
void	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::legalizeVectorType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize, llvm::VectorType *vectorTy, llvm::SmallVectorImpl< llvm::Type * > &types)
	Turn a vector type in a sequence of legal component vector types.
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::mustPassRecordIndirectly (CodeGenModule &CGM, const RecordDecl *record)
	Is the given record type required to be passed and returned indirectly because of language restrictions?
ABIArgInfo	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::classifyReturnType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type)
	Classify the rules for how to return a particular type.
ABIArgInfo	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::classifyArgumentType (CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type)
	Classify the rules for how to pass a particular type.
void	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::computeABIInfo (CodeGenModule &CGM, CGFunctionInfo &FI)
	Compute the ABI information of a swiftcall function.
bool	clang::CodeGen::swiftcall::isSwiftErrorLoweredInRegister (CodeGenModule &CGM)
	Is swifterror lowered to a register by the target ABI?